|
Saturday, November 07, 2009 - 9:53 AM
The theory that a royal conspiracy was behind the murders is a very popular one. Not only is it the premise of the 2001 movie From Hell with Johnny Depp and Heather Graham, it has spawned made-for-TV movies and documentaries and books.  Prince Albert Victor, Duke of Clarence This
most appealing theory unfolds like this: Prince Albert Victor, known
popularly as Eddy, was the grandson of Queen Victoria and in direct
line to the throne of England. His father later became King Edward VII.
Had Eddy outlived his father, he would have become King of England.
Eddy
frequently went slumming in the Whitechapel area. He met and had an
affair with a shop girl named Annie Crook, who he kept in an apartment
there. Annie became pregnant with his child and, according to one
version of the story, married Eddy secretly in a Roman Catholic
wedding. Other versions have the child being born out of wedlock.  Sir William Gull Marrying
or impregnating a Catholic girl of low social standing was a definite
no-no for a future king, and wind of this scandal got back to Grandma,
who insisted on a resolution to the problem. The prime minister
delegated this task to Queen Victoria's physician, Sir William Gull.
Dr.
Gull had Annie taken away to a hospital where he savaged her memory and
intellect, leaving her institutionalized for the rest of her life. Mary
Kelly was caring for Annie's royal daughter, named Alice Margaret, when
Annie was kidnapped. Mary Kelly, along with her friends, Polly Nichols,
Annie Chapman, and Elizabeth Stride, all knew about the relationship
between Annie Crook and the prince, as well as their infant daughter.
But they couldn't keep their mouths shut and thus became a major
liability to the Crown. Again Dr. Gull was asked for
his help, this time in permanently silencing Mary Kelly and her
friends. To explain the sudden demise of these troublesome whores, Dr.
Gull cleverly created the persona of Jack the Ripper, a frenzied lust
murderer with some degree of medical expertise. Gull's
trusty coachman locates each of the friends of Mary Kelly and persuades
them individually to get into the coach. Dr. Gull then murders each
woman, mutilates her in increasingly savage ways and leaves her dead on
the street. Mary and her dwindling group of friends believe that a
vicious gang that has threatened them in the past is responsible for
the murders. Dr. Gull saves Mary for last and subjects her to ghoulish
butchery. One variation of the theory has Dr. Gull,
whose intellect has been impaired by a stroke, becoming a kind of
Masonic ritual executioner. Not only does Gull go to great lengths to
create the belief that a sex-crazed doctor has perpetrated the series
of murders, he also weaves into that creation some obscure ancient
Masonic lore. Gull's Masonic group, which is the virtual Who's Who of
the London upper class, includes top police officials like Sir Robert
Anderson, who help Gull in his efforts to protect the throne. Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire
Everybody
loves a conspiracy theory and no doubt this one will endure for a long
time despite the fact that there is no evidence to support it and quite
a lot of reason to doubt that there is any truth to it at all. There
did exist a woman named Annie Crook who worked in a shop in Cleveland
Street, and she had an illegitimate daughter named Alice Margaret. But
there is nothing to connect her to a relationship with Eddy, whose
sexual preferences were rumored to be men rather than women.
Homosexuality was against the law in Victorian England and a man of
Eddy's social standing would have to be very discreet if he were
homosexually inclined. Cleveland Street was the home
of a brothel that catered to wealthy homosexuals. The brothel was
raided, giving rise to strong rumors that Eddy was one of the patrons
there, but there is no existing evidence of his presence there at the
time of the raid. Also, there is nothing to connect Annie Crook to Mary
Kelly, or to connect Mary Kelly to any of the other victims of Jack the
Ripper. There is no evidence to suggest that they even knew each other
at all and it is most unlikely that they were a tightly knit group of
friends, or it would have been discovered in the interviews that police
had with the families and friends of each victim. The
victims of Jack the Ripper were murdered where they were found, not in
a coach or at some other location. Also, from witnesses in the crime
scene areas, it is very unlikely that more than one man carried out the
crimes. Regarding Dr. Gull's ability to be Jack the Ripper, Donald Rumbelow in The Complete Jack the Ripper points out: Medically
the slight stroke that Gull had in 1887 was the first attack of severe
paralysis. Although he recovered from it, its effects were serious
enough to prohibit him from further medical practice. Taken with the
fact that he was 70 years old at this time, this is surely enough to
cast doubts on the story of his roaming about Whitechapel. Finally,
Gull did not die in a lunatic asylum. He died at home on 29 January
1890, after a third stroke which left him speechless. Also,
there is nothing to suggest that the Ripper murders had anything
whatsoever to do with the Masons. Nor is it known whether Dr. Gull, Sir
Robert Anderson or any of the other high level police officials
involved in the Ripper murders were even members of the Freemasons. Would
the Crown have resorted to the flamboyant murder of five unfortunate
women in order to protect itself? Donald Rumbelow explains the Royal
Marriages Act, which was designed by George III to prevent his sons
from marrying against his wishes: "Under this Act,
any such marriage as that between Eddy and Annie could have been set
aside as illegal, since (1) Eddy was under 25 years old at the time of
the marriage; and (2) he had married without the Queen's consent." Finally, as John Douglas and Mark Olshaker state in The Cases That Haunt Us,
the frenzied butchery of the Ripper murders is the "work of a
disorganized, paranoid offender," not a person who "could continue
functioning and interacting with people in a relatively normal way. Dr.
Gull simply does not fit this profile. There are a
number of variants to the Royal Conspiracy Theory. One has Eddy being
Jack the Ripper. Suffering from tertiary syphilis, he goes into
murderous rages and haunts the streets of Whitechapel in search of
victims. That is, until his keepers catch on to this and lock him up
until his death from syphilis. There is no
supporting evidence for this variation either. Royal records show Eddy
as a victim of the influenza epidemic of 1892. Also, several years
after the Ripper murders in 1891, Eddy was named the Duke of Clarence,
not a title that would have been bestowed on a person that was
violently insane from tertiary syphilis. While Eddy did not possess a
brilliant mind, he was always considered a nice person and was not in
any way inclined to violence. While there were
rumors about Eddy's sexual proclivities during his lifetime, there was
never any indication that police or anyone else at that time thought of
him as a suspect in the Ripper murders. Indeed, Eddy had pretty
unshakeable alibis for all of the murders, often being far from London
when they occurred.  James Kenneth Stephen Another
variant on the Royal Conspiracy Theory was that Eddy's tutor at
Cambridge, James Kenneth Stephen, was Jack the Ripper: after Eddy ended
a homosexual relationship with his tutor, Stephen committed the murders
for revenge.
While it was true that Stephen was
Eddy's tutor, there is no evidence of a homosexual relationship between
them. A few years after Eddy left Cambridge, Stephen's brain was
seriously damaged in an accident and he eventually died in an asylum.
Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire The emotional and mental problems that plagued Stephen after his
accident gave rise to some violent phrases in his poetry, but that
certainly doesn't add up to being a serial killer. Like the other
variations of the Royal Conspiracy Theory, this one has no evidence to
support it either. Variants of the Royal Conspiracy
will continue to prosper because they lend themselves to movies and
books. They are dramatic stories that explain Jack the Ripper in
motives that we can all understand, unlike the frenzied evil that
drives a brutal serial killer.
|